Keith .. Olbermann .. Is .. Evil

31 August 2007, Friday

Day of Blogness, 2007

Filed under: And Now for Something Completely Different — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 18:49:46

OK, so I’m working the grass clippings into the compost pile in the backyard and a thought pops into my head:

“I wonder if Pedro has thrown his bullpen session yet?”

I mention this to illustrate the Metsification of my life and to partially explain my Blog Day list. I struggled to come up with a list of five blogs — and one of them isn’t even a blog, but a Web site.

I don’t read enough as it is and baseball season has me very much focused on the Mets. I haven’t gone out of my way to search for new blogs and other sources of news/comment. I feel kind of bad about this. But — for crying out loud — we’re in a pennant race!

I’ll likely improve the variety and quantity of my online and offline reading material once the season is over. I like to think of myself as well-rounded person. It’s just that things get a little whacky during baseball season.

Four blogs and one Web site that I recommend:

Aligarians — Urdu poetry. I can’t remember how I found this blog, but I like it a lot. The only thing is I wish that more of the poetry was translated into English.

Faith and Fear in Flushing — Their knowledge of All Things Mets is astounding. I particularly like the way the blog shows how baseball is woven into the lives of its fans.

MetsBlog — My Grand Central Station for Mets news.

PsyBlog — Psychology interests me. And I guess I am always wondering why I am the way that I am.

The Gematriculator — This is a Web site, not a blog. It measures evil, so I feel a certain warmth towards it. But it rates this blog 38% Evil and 62% Good, which is pretty dang embarassing. I obviously have to improve my Evil qualities.

30 August 2007, Thursday

My Broadcast Team Can Beat Up Your Broadcast Team

Filed under: En Fuego Deficiency, Let's Go Mets! — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 20:40:09

Hawaii commented in Culture Club (although I know it was directed towards what I wrote in Still Waiting for Godot … and tonight’s Mets game):

And to sweitch subjects on a dime – I used to adore Tim McCarver back in my NY area living, Met wortshipping years. Is he no longer any good?

Do you still worship the Mets? They haven’t been very worship-worthy this week. They need to get on the Path to Redemption after the stinky series in Philly.

Il mio male for the snide remark on Tim McCarver.

I mean, geez, if I’m not going to hate Michael Vick how can I hate McCarver?

I used to like him, and his Fox Sports colleague Joe Buck, a lot more. But over the past four years I have undergone a complete Metsification by listening to the New York Mets’ radio and tv broadcast teams. As with the players on “your team” fans get very attached to the team’s broadcasters. You spend your whole summer with them; in some cases you grow up with them. It was really sweet hearing Gary Cohen wax poetic on the appearance of Ralph Kiner and Tim McCarver together on last Saturday’s Fox broadcast. He said “It took me back to my childhood”– back to the day when the Kiner and McCarver were the Mets’ broadcast team.

When you listen to one teams’ broadcasters for the entire summer it’s an affront to be handed off to what feels like imposters. It’s the same way I feel about DP leaving the air. Only a temporary hiatus, thank goodness, but it still is weird to pop the radio on in the afternoons and hear Not Dan Patrick. Heck, it even feels weird to hear other people read the commercial spots that Dan used to do.

(For what it’s worth, while he’s not DP I enjoyed listening to Mike Tirico earlier this week. I didn’t listen today; the Mets had a day game. Four hours of gut-wrenching action. I could use a day off after that, but they start a three-game series versus Atlanta tomorrow. The long baseball season is tough on the players. It’s dang tough on the fans, too.)

Buck and McCarver misspeak on occasion; this Family Guy take on McCarver is hilarious:

And I don’t hate the ESPN broadcast team of Jon Miller and Joe Morgan as some do. (The Fire Joe Morgan Web site is pretty funny, but it kind of reminds me of Olbermann Watch in its single-minded hatred of one man.) But Morgan and Miller do make quite a few factual errors (here’s a brief tally from the Sunday Dodgers-Mets game). And that thing he said about how the All-Star Game pitcher should be chosen really rubbed me the wrong way. Listening to him on the DP Show, he always sounded pretty reasonable. I was disappointed with his racially-tinged logic.

I’m not looking forward to the post-season (which the Mets will hopefully achieve by some better on-field execution and the grace of God) because the tv broadcast rights were assigned to Fox and TBS. So fans of the teams that play for all the marbles won’t get their team’s tv broadcasters. If the Mets make it we’ll resort to what we did last year: mute the tv audio and get the Mets’ WFAN radio broadcast via the computer. The broadcasts aren’t in sync — the radio can be anywhere from 15-60 seconds behind the tv broadcast — which makes for a bizarre way to watch a baseball game. But the fans are true to the orange-and-blue — the guys on the field and the guys in the broadcast booth.

The Lord is good to all, Compassionate to every creature.

Filed under: Let's Go Mets!, Wheel of Life — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 15:57:15

Psalm 145:9

Karl wrote in Transcending All Cultures …:

This is HILARIOUS and a relief from all the Vick crap in the news. Love it when they start cheering Lets go Mets!

You aren’t going to get swept by the Phillies, are you?

Il mio male for making two Vick-related posts in a row.

In recent months I read two absolutely wonderful accounts of people’s lives with their pets. I hope these provide some additional relief from Vickmania. But be prepared to get weepy; I couldn’t get through either of these articles without crying.

If the Mets get swept by the Phils I might cry. (Phils lead 8-5 in the top of the 7th as I write this.) Then again, losing first place might be what the guys need. They seem to have been coasting all season. Dropping out of first might be the whack-upside-the-head they need.

I give you the link to the post on Faith and Fear in Flushing, but the entire Times’ piece as readers without TimesSelect will not be able to access it.

June 10, 2007
By Arthur Phillips

MY little guy is growing up fast. He’s toilet-trained, he goes uncomplainingly to sleep and he no longer chews on his playmates’ faces until they bleed. He is 8 months old, and I know, years from now, that I will always remember this summer as the time he and I fell in love.

Between this summer and next, this latest beagle — the third of my adult life — will age from zero to 1 (or zero to 7), on a fast track to reduce me to mourning sometime in my early 50s.

But for now, Hamish is at my feet, on the terrace of a Brooklyn cafe, trying to sit still as a writer’s dog should while I work on this essay. I ponder the nature of memory; he chews a gnarled leathery stick that is, the sweet lady at the pet store promised me, 100 percent bull penis.

My girlfriend and I were living in Boston late last century when we bought Edgar, a lemon beagle, who, at 8 weeks old, still just tipped over when he was tired, asleep before he hit the floor.

The acquisition of a puppy implied vast confidence in our relationship; at least one of our parents asked if we’d really thought about our ”commitment.” To each other? To the dog? We were already intertwined: that was summer 1995.

Some of my clearest memories of that Boston summer come from Edgar introducing me to the carnival known as ”dog parks,” enclosed spaces where dogs are healthy and humans spectacularly neurotic.

The figures come back very sharply (maybe too sharply to be trusted): the man who pulled his healthy Labrador to the park in a shiny red Radio Flyer wagon; the woman who fretted that her female shepherd was made ”uncomfortable” by the advances of male dogs; the bearded Viking giant who rolled his gigantic wolf hybrid on its back and growled in its face at the slightest sign of disobedience.

Summer meant watching my girlfriend walk Edgar on the banks of the Charles, where they illustrated the complex physics involved when spandex-clad skaters crossed the axis of a retractable leash. That was the summer of Edgar raiding picnics on the Boston Common, liberating hot dogs from blankets without breaking stride. It was the summer of long, idyllic mornings in the Public Garden, reading Thomas Mann and not quite figuring out my literary ambitions, Edgar always at my side.

But one memory above all gives that summer its place in my life story, and Edgar sits obediently at its center.

My girlfriend and I read in one of our many training books that dogs are happiest when playing games similar to the tasks they were bred for. Shepherds should herd; retrievers retrieve; hounds track. Dog-obsessed, we committed ourselves to this, lest the little fellow’s development be stunted by shabby parenting. Beagles are purported to be rabbit hunters, so we set to work providing our friend with a chance to self-actualize by honing his lagomorphocidal instincts.

In the rippling heat of a Boston July, we took Edgar to a green suburban meadow. He sat dutifully as we dragged a small canvas cylinder drenched in ”rabbit scent” through the tall grass, making an aromatic path, then leaving the toy and a dog biscuit hidden at the trail’s end.

”Ready, boy? Get that rabbit!” I urged the stationary beagle, a small Ferdinand the Bull. ”Kill the wabbit!”

I tapped his rear, and, as if I could almost hear him say, ”I would prefer not to,” he stood up, put his nose to the ground, and walked off, in precisely the opposite direction of the imaginary bunny’s escape.

Edgar sat down again, some 20 feet away, where, I swear, an actual rabbit — aroused to lunacy by the field steaming with eau de lapin — leapt directly over him.

The beauty and strangeness of the sight — reckless prey taunting sleepy predator — led me to the most reckless moment of my life, and I suggested to my girlfriend that she might consider marrying me. She, equally inspired to leap over danger’s cute and furry head, thought the notion not unfeasible.

Six summers later, my wife and I took Edgar and our young son to live in Paris for two years. Its reputation as a dog-centric city is merited but not in a way most American dogs would appreciate. The French have so confounded canine pleasures with their own that they simply treat dogs as marginally furrier, shorter Frenchmen: le chien is welcome to sit on the banquette at the cafe, is warmly greeted when browsing the boutiques, is considered an old friend by the grocer, but is, like le français bipède, strictly forbidden from setting paw on green grass.

This reversal of Boston — no dog parks, just cafes — was disorienting to Edgar and me, both of us now in early middle age, our timelines crossing there in Paris. So we marched up and down the Seine, his leash hooked to the stroller, and we discovered that the beagle’s natural prey is not the rabbit, but the baguette.

I have no shortage of non-dog memories from Paris, but the chronology clarifies itself instantly when I remember this: whenever we came home, even in the hottest, most unconditioned air, Edgar still ran up the three flights of crimson-carpeted staircase to our door, his back legs propelling in unison, like a dwarf kangaroo. But, only a single summer later, when we had moved our growing family to the coast of South Carolina, Edgar walked upstairs one leg at a time.

He and I forged a new summer routine on the Atlantic Coast, more suited to a dog of later middle years and his suddenly younger human. The extreme heat allowed us outside only early in the morning and late in the evening, and then we walked on the beach.

Edgar, beach, sunset: and at once I have those summers in detail. We wandered the shore, confident without a leash, and I would occasionally slow down for my friend, now definitely older than I, while (and you’ll have to trust me) dolphins arched and leapt not 30 feet from our wet bare feet and paws. A pod of four to six would, on some fine nights, keep unlikely perfect pace with us, matching our step for a mile or two.

Because of new zoning laws that require all novelists to live in Brooklyn, we moved to the borough a few years back, my two children, my wife and our elderly dog, Edgar.

Despite all the evidence of passing time (my younger boy could talk, my older liked school, I was writing my third novel), nothing brings back that first New York summer any faster than the memory of Edgar not terribly interested in the dogs at the dog park near our home, and the summer after that, him slow with cancer, an old, old fellow with no interest in much of anything but trying to find a comfortable position on the couch.

That same pup who had, 11 summers before, blessed my betrothal in the tall grass of the Boston suburbs, I now carried in my arms the six blocks from our Brooklyn home to the veterinary hospital where the final kindness I could do my old friend at the end of our last walk was to give him the injection that made his tired body kick, then shudder, then sleep.

Will I — 40 years hence — distinguish between the summer my son was 8 and the one he was 9? I admit: maybe not. But, with a dog, for whom fewer than 15 summers is a lifetime, each new, accelerating summer memorably marks my slower life, too.

It seems like summer today. Brooklyn looks wonderful. The cherry and the white pear blossoms have fallen, but it’s not too hot yet. Ellis Island floats, sharply focused, an easy jump off the end of Atlantic Avenue. We have just come from the dog park where Hamish and a greyhound puppy have rolled down a hill wrapped in each other’s paws, each chewing on the other’s face.

At the cafe, his leash is binding my shins as I try and fail to find the words to express all this. He has made a gift of his half-consumed bull penis to the nice people at the table next to me. He is putting his paws up on my lap. I have reset the clock of my memory with this new puppy, staring up with floppy ears and brown eyes, asking when, oh when, can we leave this place and go for another unforgettable walk?

Arthur Phillips is the author of ”The Egyptologist” and, most recently, ”Angelica.”

29 August 2007, Wednesday

Pass/Fail Test

Filed under: Karma, Suffering — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 12:35:15

This is so sad:

Dogs From Vick’s Kennel Have to Pass a Behavior Test

The fates of the dogs seized from a property owned by Michael Vick hinge on the recommendations from certified animal behaviorists.

Prosecutors have asked the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals to evaluate the 53 pit bulls taken from Vick’s kennel. …

Ed Sayres, the president of the A.S.P.C.A., said that because the case was so high profile, the government had taken extra care to keep the dogs alive and save those that were safe enough to return to society.

“There is a low percentage of rehabilitation, but the potential is there,” Sayres said in a telephone interview. “I’d estimate that about 10 to 20 percent can be rehabilitated.” …

Pass, live.

Fail, die.

Forget the Wonderlic. There should be a behavior test for pro athletes.

Michael Vick channels Martin Luther King, Jr.? You Cannot Be Serious!

Filed under: En Fuego Deficiency — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 01:09:07

Hawaii wrote in Culture Club:

And one more topic switch. I miss DP. Just saying.

We hear you loud and clear.

We miss him, too. We also miss The Usual Suspects: Reills, The Dalai Lama, The Greatest Three-Point Shooter in NBA History, KO ….

And Michael Wilbon, too.

Wilbon had another great column yesterday on the Michael Vick case, A Long Way to Go. I guess I’m about as sick of the case as the next normal (i.e., not rabidly pro-Vick nor radical animal liberationist) person, but some really good writing has been generated by it.

It was disturbing to read in Wilbon’s column about how some of the pro-Vick people decided to show their support:

… the people singing Negro spirituals and “We Shall Overcome” outside the courthouse yesterday …

That’s almost sick.

That is sick.

I grew up watching news footage of black people peacefully marching for the rights that white Americans took for granted and being attacked by police. My family got both Life and Look, and these magazine published pictures of police setting their dogs loose to attack blacks, of firehoses being turned on peaceful protesters. I’ve put on a lot of years since those days, but my admiration and respect for African Americans was shaped to a great extent by the things I saw and read and heard during my childhood. To serenade Michael Vick with “We Shall Overcome” is downright insulting to the people who worked and died during the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s.

Martin Luther King, Jr. said:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

It’s sad that some people are judging Vick not on his character but by the color of his skin. Black = Innocent does not compute.

Equating Vick’s dogfighting saga with that of the Civil Rights movement means that the Campaign to Save Michael’s Image has begun. Expect him to do the “Please Forgive Me, I’m Actually a Nice Guy” confessional on Oprah. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon ….

(NB: Text and video of King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, from American Rhetoric. This should be required reading and viewing, at least once a year.)

28 August 2007, Tuesday

Transcending All Cultures …

Filed under: Let's Go Mets! — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 14:00:49

I saw this on MetsBlog.

27 August 2007, Monday

Our Long National Nightmare is Over

Filed under: Karma — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 22:40:14

America Held Hostage: The Michael Vick Dogfighting Saga

Hey, only 124 days (between 25 April and 27 August).

I thought the statement that Michael Vick made today was quite good. I haven’t seen video of it — I just heard it on the radio — but he sounded sincere and not overly scripted, even though the statement was likely edited, re-edited, and rehearsed all weekend. And I don’t find fault with that. The statement he made today was the opening chapter of the next part of his life. The words he spoke and the manner of his presentation were critical. If my career and life depended on a 5 minute speech I would have rehearsed the heck out of it, too.

I peeked into The Show That Is Not The Dan Patrick Show today (don’t you think This is ESPN Radio is a dopey name for a show?) and enjoyed the interview with Denny McLain. I got a good laugh when McLain derided the part of Vick’s statement where he said “I found Jesus.”

“Found Jesus?” scoffed McLain. “I didn’t know He was missing!”

I wonder if Vick got that Jesus thing going after hearing Ray Lewis on one of DP’s last shows.

I like what Vick said about redemption:

“I will redeem myself,” Vick said at the news conference. “I have to.”

I’m not one to root against people, so even though what Vick did was reprehensible I hope he can turn his life around. “Redemption” for me doesn’t mean that he regains his status as an NFL star. “Redemption” could be as simple as becoming a responsible, productive member of society. Not a simple task, however, given Vick’s past and the people with whom he has associated.

Karl commented in Kill Anything With Your Bare Hands Lately?:

If you listened to the Herd awhile back he said about the Vick case “You can treat drug addiction, you can’t treat cruelty.” I don’t listen to Cowherd much becuase he is annoying, but that was an interesting way to look at it. Sometimes the things that he says make you stop and think.

I don’t feel that a person can be beyond redemption. That’s the optimist in me hoping for the best. But how, indeed, can someone purge himself or herself of cruelty? Cruelty isn’t one of the Deadly Sins, but when you give the matter some thought it probably should be.

Alberto Gonzales: The Farewell Tour

Filed under: Department of Breaking News — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 12:10:23

26 August 2007, Sunday

Still Waiting for Godot … and tonight’s Mets game

Filed under: En Fuego Deficiency, Let's Go Mets! — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 16:50:09

hourglass.jpgScoop commented in Ouch. My Ears Hurt

… Finally, I direct you to this column from the San Diego Union-Tribune: http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/20070824-9999-1s24mediacol.html

Jay Posner (who, among other things, mentions that Ralph Kiner will be calling the third inning of today’s Mets-Dodgers game on Fox with Tim McCarver) not only refers to Keith as “TV’s best news commentator” (yeah!), but says: “ESPN Radio hasn’t replaced Dan Patrick, who announced he was leaving just a scant 6½ weeks ago. After hearing several tryouts, I’d probably favor Erik Kuselias or Doug Gottlieb. Failing that, I’ll take anyone not named Stephen A. Smith.”

From your lips to God’s (sore) ears, pal. Talk about a man who thinks volume = value.

I was shocked to find the Dodgers-Mets game on here yesterday. I fully expected to be consigned to Sawx-Sox Hell (the other Fox Saturday day game.) Nothing against either team, but the Sawx are not my team and the Sox are playing bad baseball this season. The gods smiled upon me and gave me LAD@NYM.

But with the game on Fox the gods also gave me Tim McCarver. That must be karmic payback for something bad I’ve done in my life. Like a lot of Mets fans I had the Fox audio off and listened to the WFAN broadcast, except for the third inning when Ralph was in the booth.

The various Mets blogs and message boards lit up with glowing remarks. It’s kind of funny how the mostly male and — shall we say — very profane writers on Mets’ fans sites go absolutely mooshy when it comes to Ralph. Baseball fans tend to be sentimental. (Mets Refugees, which is pretty much a no-holds-barred forum, has a rule: 14. Under no circumstances are you allowed to make fun of, mock, or diss Ralph Kiner. Then again, there is a “no nudity” rule for users’ avatars, and if you ask me some of the women in those pics just might as well be naked.)

McCarver was even pretty decent when paired up with Ralph. Someone even suggested that Fox ditch Joe Buck for Mets playoff games and have the McCarver-Kiner team do them.

I’d go for that.

(My only complaint about yesterday’s game is that Fox had Ralph on for only one inning. When he broadcasts with Gary Cohen, Keith Hernandez, and Ron Darling on SNY he’ll be on for up to three innings.)

Today’s Mets game isn’t. Because the team is in contention for the playoffs, as are the Dodgers, today’s game was turned into a night game by ESPN. This means no Gary, Keith, and Ron. We get stuck with Jon Miller and Joe Morgan.

Miller is tolerable. I liked Morgan as a player, but as a commentator he is ‘pert near horrible. Opinion-wise, he’s entitled to have his own. But he doesn’t even get the facts right. During Tom Glavine’s 300th win game, Morgan went on about how Mets secondbaseman Luis Castillo was having trouble with pop-ups at Wrigley because he was unfamiliar with the park, having played his entire career in the American League. Morgan sounded authoritative and very convincing. But Castillo played for ten years with the Florida Marlins (an NL East team) and also hit the famous foul that became the Steve Bartman Ball — AT WRIGLEY FIELD.

Morgan totally lost credibility with me earlier this summer when he was on the Dan Patrick Show talking about Major League Baseball’s All-Star Game. Morgan said (and I paraphrase) “All things being equal, American League team manager Jim Leyland should choose C.C. Sabathia as his starting pitcher. It would send a positive message to African Americans if an African American were chosen to start the game.” I did a double-take and actually stared at the radio. I was so dumbfounded by the statement, I can’t even remember if DP challenged him on this. At the time Sabathia had the most wins of pitchers on the AL roster, but other guys had better ERA’s and K/BB ratios. When Leyland selected Dan Haren (a white guy) to start I kind of expected listeners to call in to the show and call Leyland a racist.

Using that “logic” if Daisuke Matsuzaka or Chien-Ming Wang had been on the AL All-Star team Leyland should have started one of them. It would mean a lot to the Asian American population to see one of their own as an All-Star Game starting pitcher. And while baseball is already huge in Japan, it is just getting established in China. Starting an Asian guy would really generate more interest in the Chinese market. (OK, so Wang is from Taiwan and not the PRC, but if it’s acceptable to use Sabathia as a African American token, then go ahead and throw Wang up against the Wall of Ethnicity and see if he will stick.)

I’ve been wondering if ESPN will allow any of its personalities to appear on Dan’s new show. They might want to circle the wagons and prevent their people from furthering DP’s new venture. Then again, ESPN has benefited from contributors from other media outlets, e.g., Michael Wilbon (from the Washington Post) and Rick Reilly (Sports Illustrated). I can live without Joe Morgan appearing on DP’s new show, but it would be a real shame for Dan to not be able to chat with Peter Gammons, particularly if KO will be on the new show.

It would be cool to hear Dan chat with Ralph Kiner and other past and present broadcasters like Vin Scully and Ernie Harwell. Yeah, they’re not in the ESPN “Who’s Now?” crowd, but I consider that a plus. In Dan’s biographical video on his Web site he calls himself “a storyteller,” and these broadcasters are the same. It would be interesting to hear their insights on how baseball and baseball broadcasting have changed over the years.

As for DP’s replacement, Kuselias or Gottlieb would be OK. I prefer Bob Valvano, but I don’t think ESPN will give him that prime time slot because he is too low-key. I refuse to listen to Stephen A. Smith because he is an idiot and while I’d like to listen to Dan Le Batard for his interesting ideas I can’t because HE EFFING YELLS TOO MUCH. It doesn’t really matter who they put into that slot. Afternoon radio for me has gone from “Hey, gotta listen to Dan!” to “I’m stuck in the car driving from point A to point B, let’s see what’s on the radio ….”

25 August 2007, Saturday

Culture Club

Filed under: Department of Relativity — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 14:56:33

http://web.swedevice.com/sistergeorge/morestuff/wallpaper.aspScoop wrote a ways back:

As if mistreating animals is somehow OK so long as you can try to claim that it’s part of someone’s “culture.”

Before I went to sleep last night I read an article on opium production in Afghanistan and the U.S. role in trying to stop it. It got me to thinking about “culture” and what we deem as acceptable and unacceptable. I mean, growing poppies is part of the Afghan culture. (Modern day Afghanistan was part of the Persian Empire, and opium and Persia go way back. Way back ….) Poppies are harvested for opium, the raw material for heroin. Illegal (and even legal) drugs are a big problem in America. Does this give us the right to quash poppy cultivation in Afghanistan?

Slide show, In the Opium Den

(I always wonder what poppy and coca farmers think when American government officials swoop down into their countries and try to get them to grow alternative crops. What? Green beans and rutabagas? Those will give them a better life than growing opium poppies or coca for cocaine? I wonder how you say You cannot be serious! in Pashto.)

But I digress. As I always do.

I made a list of cultural practices that I think most Americans would find unacceptable. Not all are on the same level of dogfighting, but it would be hard for the average American to accept any of these in the interest of respecting another culture or subculture.

  • Arranged marriages
  • Bullfighting — I saw bullfighting on tv when I was a kid. (In that day and age the FCC wasn’t worried about exposing viewers to gore and violence.) I was appalled. Since then I always root for the bull. I suppose this loses me points in the “Love Thy Neighbor” category of religious tenets, but it should earn me points in the Compassion for all Sentient Beings category. If I go to hell or accumulate bad karma and doom myself to a future rebirth for wanting the matador to die, then that’s the way it is and I accept my fate. Six or seven men versus one animal just isn’t fair. If it was one-on-one I’d feel differently.
  • Cockfighting
  • Displaying the confederate flag
  • Drug use for religious purposes (e.g., ganja, peyote)
  • Footbinding — If you have a weak stomach I recommend against reading the linked article.
  • Genital mutilation — If you have a weak stomach don’t read this one, either.
  • Honor killing
  • Polygamy
  • Slavery
  • Suttee

Thus I find it pretty screwy when people use the word “culture” to defend one practice or another. Just because something is “part of my culture” or “traditional” doesn’t make it good.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.