Keith .. Olbermann .. Is .. Evil

28 February 2007, Wednesday

Baa-ram-ewe, baa-ram-ewe. To your breed, your fleece, your clan be true. Sheep be true. Baa-ram-ewe.

Filed under: Obscure Cultural References, The More Things Change ... — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 20:42:59

rrgirl comments in As soon as you’re born, you start dying; So you might as well have a good time.:

I got lost in the tall weeds of the literary references, especially after reading the analysis. whew.
I really liked the picture. the goats’ faces have such presence. the sheep look like big fluffy sweaters on the hoof but except for the background, we see no sheep faces. the engraving vaguely suggests Duhrer but it’s a little coarse; certainly northern European. I poked around and eventually found the accreditation to Karel DuJardin, a Dutch artist with whom I’m not familiar. his bio on Wikipedia reveals a short life by 21st century standards. I got a “plus que change, plus que meme” sense. more goat than sheep. Karel DuJardin
thanks for providing so many levels of meaning. as usual, I’m grateful, with awe.

Phil’s Home Run BellYou get a homer bell for Outstanding Sleuthieness!

I’m trying to be better in citing sources. I read another blog that puts the reference for images in the “alternate text” of the image’s file properties, thought that was a cool idea, and decided to follow suit. For “Sheep and Goats” I initially had a link to the .jpg but I just edited it to this more informational one: Flock of Sheep and Goats.

In Firefox, right click the image and in the window that pops up select “Properties” to see the alternate text. In Internet Explorer, move your cursor over the image and the alternate text will pop up in a small box.

I was going to look for “sheep and goats” clip art but saw that picture on Google Images and decided to use it. Just a lucky find. Yes, very Dürer-like.

You sure are right. DuJardin was very goaty. Interesting to note that even in the 17th century poor, young people were hooking up with rich, old ones as a form of financial planning.

Volunteer Fuego

Filed under: En Fuego! — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 10:05:36

This is the kind of thing that makes college sports better than the pros.

Bruce Pearl, Tennessee men’s basketball coach went shirtless, painted his chest, and cheered for the Lady Vols in their big game against Duke last month. Unfortunately, Tennessee lost to the Blue Devils that night. Lady Vols coach Pat Summitt repaid Coach Pearl for his spirit by cheering for the men’s team last night during their big game versus Florida, which they won. Men’s and women’s teams support each other, but it’s not often you see coaches go to these extremes.

CSTV giving props to Bruce Pearl:

 
Pat Summitt could use some singing lessons. (Note Vols alum Peyton Manning and Phil Fulmer, Tennessee football coach, at the game.)

27 February 2007, Tuesday

The horror … the horror ….

Filed under: Obscure Cultural References, Well-Spoken — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 23:38:51

Phil’s Home Run BellHomer bell for orinenglish for pointing out how KO pronounces “horror.” He said it today on the Big Show (first segment, about halfway through).

On Language Nazi:

rrgirl: feb-yoo-ary. nails on the blackboard. is that one little “r” in the middle sooooo hard to say? does it have to rhyme with January? dictionay.com says either way is acceptable but I don’t get it.

KO drops the “r”. I guess he’s human, too.

CP: Shed-ule gets to me, but I try to be understanding because, after all, they are the British.

Scoop: I get paid to be grammar police. But there are things even I am not all that good with. Keith made another blunder on the radio recently, and now I can’t think of what it was, but he mispronounced the kind of word you would expect Keith to know and be one of the few people NOT to mess up.

Nice to know he’s, er, human.

Today he went between “Hah-nus” and “Hoe-nus” Wagner (the Wagner T206 card sold for over $2 million recently). I believe the correct pronunciation is “Hah-nus.”

A friend of mine says “toe-let” instead of “toilet.” When writing, “Wednesday” is abbreviated “Wens.”

I saw this during the Super Bowl and thought it was very funny:

I haven’t noticed any backlash at the ad for poking fun at immigrants and their accents. I think ethnic humor is more acceptable when everyone is a target and no one group is singled out.

26 February 2007, Monday

WikiTruthiepedia

Filed under: I Heard It Through the Grapevine — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 23:41:25

Erika writes in Skinny White Girls and Short White Boys:

Paul Coro was a few years ahead of me in high school…thanks for the blast from the past, KOIE!

Cool beans! It’s a small world after all.

Glad I picked that Arizona Republic article. Google pulled up quite a few items when I searched on “shaq nash mvp.”

I like to cite references whenever I can; it’s part of my training. I certainly don’t expect you to believe everything I write, which is why I always spend time searching for sources and including a plethora links in my posts. I also realize that some readers are big KO fans, but not big sports fans so I add links to sports sources to help develop your sports smarts. In doing so I often find cool stuff, like that note on Steve Nash by Charles Barkley. Sometimes it will take longer to find sources and build links than it does to write a post. But it’s a good exercise for me to read more about various topics, correct factual errors, and really think about what I’m trying to say. And although this is just a blog I want to be a credible writer.

wtf-guys.jpgI mean, for example: Someone could write something about Keith Olbermann having a one-night stand, blog the crap out of that, and certain readers will believe it hook, line, and sinker. Could you imagine anything so ridiculous?

I’m definitely obsessive about backing up my arguments and illustrating my points. I used to avoid using Wikipedia when googling the Internets for information. I didn’t think an Everybody and His Mother-in-Law Gets to Edit This resource could be very accurate. But the more I read it, the more I was impressed. I’ve used it a lot and have cited it many times in this blog.

So I was totally bummed when I read this in the Times: A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source.

(Text of article is at the end of this blog entry.)

Not that I’m writing research papers here, but I do want to be accurate. Still, I think most of the Wikipedia entries are valid. I hadn’t realized that teachers use it as a training tool for their students, who put much time and effort into researching topics and contributing to the Wiki. This accounts for some of the stunningly detailed (and I assumed accurate) entries that I’ve read. But just because something sounds scholarly doesn’t mean that it is. I have also come across gross inaccuracies — very obvious falsehoods as well as outright libel.

Even so, I like the open source, idealistic spirit of the venture. One of the beauties of Wikipedia is that it is self-correcting — that errors will, eventually, be corrected by knowledgeable users. I’ve actually done some editing in it, fixing a few typographical errors.

Thus I will keep using Wikipedia as a resource. The writing style is easy to read and the layout and graphics are nice. Entries usually contain a good variety of outside references; some are like full-scale research papers. I’ll read it with a more critical eye now and will check out articles’ external references more frequently, which are good practices with any source.

Caveat lector, always a good standard practice.

———————————————————————————–
A History Department Bans Citing Wikipedia as a Research Source
February 21, 2007
By Noam Cohen

When half a dozen students in Neil Waters’s Japanese history class at Middlebury College asserted on exams that the Jesuits supported the Shimabara Rebellion in 17th-century Japan, he knew something was wrong. The Jesuits were in “no position to aid a revolution,” he said; the few of them in Japan were in hiding.

He figured out the problem soon enough. The obscure, though incorrect, information was from Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopedia, and the students had picked it up cramming for his exam.

Dr. Waters and other professors in the history department had begun noticing about a year ago that students were citing Wikipedia as a source in their papers. When confronted, many would say that their high school teachers had allowed the practice.

But the errors on the Japanese history test last semester were the last straw. At Dr. Waters’s urging, the Middlebury history department notified its students this month that Wikipedia could not be cited in papers or exams, and that students could not “point to Wikipedia or any similar source that may appear in the future to escape the consequences of errors.”

With the move, Middlebury, in Vermont, jumped into a growing debate within journalism, the law and academia over what respect, if any, to give Wikipedia articles, written by hundreds of volunteers and subject to mistakes and sometimes deliberate falsehoods. Wikipedia itself has restricted the editing of some subjects, mostly because of repeated vandalism or disputes over what should be said.

Although Middlebury’s history department has banned Wikipedia in citations, it has not banned its use. Don Wyatt, the chairman of the department, said a total ban on Wikipedia would have been impractical, not to mention close-minded, because Wikipedia is simply too handy to expect students never to consult it.

At Middlebury, a discussion about the new policy is scheduled on campus on Monday, with speakers poised to defend and criticize using the site in research.

Jimmy Wales, the co-founder of Wikipedia and chairman emeritus of its foundation, said of the Middlebury policy, “I don’t consider it as a negative thing at all.”

He continued: “Basically, they are recommending exactly what we suggested — students shouldn’t be citing encyclopedias. I would hope they wouldn’t be citing Encyclopaedia Britannica, either.

“If they had put out a statement not to read Wikipedia at all, I would be laughing. They might as well say don’t listen to rock ’n’ roll either.”

Indeed, the English-language version of the site had an estimated 38 million users in the United States in December, and can be hard to avoid while on the Internet. Google searches on such diverse subjects as historical figures like Confucius and concepts like torture give the Wikipedia entry the first listing.

In some colleges, it has become common for professors to assign students to create work that appears on Wikipedia. According to Wikipedia’s list of school and university projects, this spring the University of East Anglia in England and Oberlin College in Ohio will have students edit articles on topics being taught in courses on the Middle East and ancient Rome.

In December 2005, a Columbia professor, Henry Smith, had the graduate students in his seminar create a Japanese bibliography project, posted on Wikipedia, to describe and analyze resources like libraries, reference books and newspapers. With 16 contributors, including the professor, the project comprises dozens of articles, including 13 on different Japanese dictionaries and encyclopedias.

In evaluations after the class, the students said that creating an encyclopedia taught them discipline in writing and put them in contact with experts who improved their work and whom, in some cases, they were later able to interview.

“Most were positive about the experience, especially the training in writing encyclopedia articles, which all of them came to realize is not an easy matter,” Professor Smith wrote in an e-mail message. “Many also retained their initial ambivalence about Wikipedia itself.”

The discussion raised by the Middlebury policy has been covered by student newspapers at the University of Pennsylvania and Tufts, among others. The Middlebury Campus, the student weekly, included an opinion article last week by Chandler Koglmeier that accused the history department of introducing “the beginnings of censorship.”

Other students call the move unnecessary. Keith Williams, a senior majoring in economics, said students “understand that Wikipedia is not a responsible source, that it hasn’t been thoroughly vetted.” Yet he said, “I personally use it all the time.”

Jason Mittell, an assistant professor of American studies and film and media culture at Middlebury, said he planned to take the pro-Wikipedia side in the campus debate. “The message that is being sent is that ultimately they see it as a threat to traditional knowledge,” he said. “I see it as an opportunity. What does that mean for traditional scholarship? Does traditional scholarship lose value?”
For his course “Media Technology and Cultural Change,” which began this month, Professor Mittell said he would require his students to create a Wikipedia entry as well as post a video on YouTube, create a podcast and produce a blog for the course.
Another Middlebury professor, Thomas Beyer, of the Russian department, said, “I guess I am not terribly impressed by anyone citing an encyclopedia as a reference point, but I am not against using it as a starting point.”

And yes, back at Wikipedia, the Jesuits are still credited as supporting the Shimabara Rebellion.

As soon as you’re born, you start dying; So you might as well have a good time.

Filed under: Lent, Wheel of Life — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 19:41:54

OK, so this probably isn’t the message American Catholic meant to send when they selected Matthew 25:31-46 for today’s Minute Meditation. Well, no one over there has probably heard of Cake.

Sheep Go To Heaven

I’m not feeling alright today,
I’m not feeling that great,
I’m not catching on fire today,
Love has started to fade,

I’m not going to smile today,
I’m not gonna laugh,
You’re out living it up today,
I’ve got dues to pay,

When the grave digger puts on the forceps,
The stonemason does all the work,
The barber can give you a haircut,
The carpenter can take you out to lunch,

Now, I just want to play on my panpipes,
I just want to drink me some wine,
As soon as you’re born, you start dying,
So you might as well have a good time,

Sheep go to Heaven,
Goats go to Hell,
Sheep go to Heaven,
Goats go to Hell,

I don’t wanna go to Sunset Strip,
I don’t wanna feel the emptiness,
Old marquees with stupid band names,
I don’t wanna go to Sunset Strip,

I don’t wanna go to Sunset Strip,
I don’t wanna feel the emptiness,
Old marquees with stupid band names,
I don’t wanna go to Sunset Strip,

The grave digger puts on the forceps,
The stonemason does all the work,
The barber can give you a haircut,
The carpenter can take you out to lunch,

Now, I just want to play on my panpipes,
I just want to drink me some wine,
As soon as you’re born, you start dying,
So you might as well have a good time,

Sheep go to Heaven,
Goats go to Hell,
Sheep go to Heaven,
Goats go to Hell,

Sheep go to Heaven,
Goats go to Hell…

http://projects.si.umich.edu/~zzheng/ArtHistory/details/1964_1.139.html

A fun and fascinating song with many religious references. For an interesting analysis check out ironyage.com.

25 February 2007, Sunday

Oral Marketing

Filed under: Department of Chromosomes: XY Annex, Remember to Drink Your Ovaltine — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 16:57:19

As opposed to viral marketing.

orinenglish commented in Remote Control:

The “You’re with me, Leather” story just makes me crack up.
And yeah, I know the demographics of ESPN Radio. That’s why I find it so refreshing when anyone gets past that “hot chick” Maxim Magazine approach on the air. And the ads in the magazine? Oh yeah, I’ve seen them! No delusions there…it’s Man-ville all the way.

From the latest ESPN Magazine (the “John Amaechi issue,” 26 February 2007):

espn-mag-old-spice-ad.jpg

OK, it’s not quite the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, but it certainly is aimed at a particular audience.

(Although since it was published in the John Amaechi issue, you’d think they would have gone Equal Time and had an ad with a really great-looking guy licking an ice cream cone. Someone missed a good marketing opportunity here.)

I have to give Old Spice’s ad agency credit for mocking the genre of “Sex Sells” in this ad. (That is, if you bother to read the text you’ll see they are mocking “Sex Sells.”) The same goes for the following tv ad, which I saw last weekend during the Capitals-Penguins hockey game:

 
I was impressed with this ad for PETA, from the same ESPN Magazine issue mentioned earlier:

espn-mag-peta-ad.jpg

It’s not uncommon for an ESPN story to mention an athlete’s pet dogs (they always have pit bulls or Rottweilers, never a Basset Hound) and they’ve done at least one photo shoot of an athlete with his dogs. Don’t know what it is about men who need to prove their manhood by having big dogs. (Or middle-aged guys who wear gold chains and speed around in Corvettes.)

I like to think I’m a fairly liberal, progressive person, but people who abuse animals or children deserve to be drawn and quartered.

Skinny White Girls and Short White Boys

Filed under: Department of Melatonin — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 13:52:29

Worried that a negative stereotype of the sorority was contributing to a decline in membership that had left its Greek-columned house here half empty, Delta Zeta’s national officers interviewed 35 DePauw members in November, quizzing them about their dedication to recruitment. They judged 23 of the women insufficiently committed and later told them to vacate the sorority house.

The 23 members included every woman who was overweight. They also included the only black, Korean and Vietnamese members. The dozen students allowed to stay were slender and popular with fraternity men — conventionally pretty women the sorority hoped could attract new recruits. Six of the 12 were so infuriated they quit.
(From the New York Times)

Often, Steve Nash is sainted for his two MVP seasons, but Shaquille O’Neal considers them to be “tainted.” …
“I don’t know what to say,” Nash said. “I’m sorry he feels that way.”

(From The Arizona Republic)

(For text of both articles go to the end of this blog entry.)

I always wondered about sororities and fraternities. They’re exclusive clubs, inviting new members based on some sort of special criteria. Yeah, there’s the community service aspect to the Greeks, and the members do use their membership to network in the business world. So there is a practical end to it. But there’s just something about them that never sat right with me. Maybe I’m too much of an anarchist to want such an organized group of pals.

My first organic chemistry lab partner at Washington was in a sorority. That concerned me; Greeks have a definite Party Girl/Party Boy reputation. And perhaps she was the life of the party. But she was also a very good student, and we got on well. I went over to her sorority house one day to pick up some notes or something; it was very sedate. The place wasn’t strewn with empty beer bottles and underwear. Maybe it was the Delta Chi High-GPA house.

The frats had a worse rep at the U-Dub, as they likely do at most campuses. The fronts of their houses were often littered with trash, lawn chairs laying around, toilet paper hanging from the trees. Once someone at a frat party hurled a chunk of ice off the roof or terrace of the house; it struck a grad student who was cycling by. Well, boys will be boys.

(Not that stupidity is a Panhellenic exclusive: my roommate in Seattle lived in a UW dorm for a year and she said people would throw fire extinguishers off the balconies. And a couple of guys in my NYU dorm smoked so much dope the people in the next building complained. Which is why I always say that having a college degree is wa-a-a-ay overrated.)

Biking to campus on a fall day my first year at Washington, I headed down Greek Row. There were rivers of young, well-dressed, attractive, mostly white people strolling down both sides of the street. I didn’t know what was going on. Fire drill? Yard sale? Later on I heard that it was Rush Week.

Ah-hah ….

The Greek system is dominated by Caucasians, but there are race-based frats and sororities. I suspect these were probably founded because non-whites could not (or could not easily) gain entrance into the more establiched fraternities and sororities on college campuses.

While Alpha Beta GammaLand is where white folks dominate, basketball has become the black man’s domain. Which is why I think so many people have a difficult time accepting Steve Nash as NBA MVP. Racism goes both ways and while few will say it (like few would come out and say they hated John Amaechi) there is some color-based discomfort over Nash winning two MVPs.

Personally, I’m cheering for Nash to win MVP this season because I want to see Shaq have a cow. (His second cow, actually: I think Shaq already had one because Dwyane Wade is injured and may be out for the season.) I don’t think Shaq is racist, even after he did that ching-chong Chinaman shout-out to Yao Ming when the Chinese center entered the league. Shaq is great with the sound bite, but not always well-spoken. He falls into the Dumb Jock category more than he should. But I don’t think he’s a bad guy. If he was a bad guy he’d have killed someone by now, the way opposing players have fouled him throughout his career. Still, it bugs the Diesel that Nash beat him out for MVP in 2005 and repeated in 2006. Part of that, I’m sure, is ego. And part of it, I suspect, is Nash’s lack of pigmentation. He can’t believe (1) that anyone is better than him, and (2) that a short white guy is better than him.

(DP made some thoughtful comments regarding Shaq’s remark on Yao and the topic of stereotypes, calling himself out for being insensitive. As Reggie Miller would say, “Daniel, you’re the greatest!”)

Talking with my Dad about it a few weeks ago, we both agreed that we’d lean towards a point guard for MVP. The point guard is the floor general; he (or she) runs the offense. The PG is like a quarterback, touching the ball on every play. I don’t watch enough basketball to say if Nash is the very best PG out there, but I do know he is very good. I wouldn’t rule out a player from another position as MVP, but I’d definitely look at point guards first.

Given what’s been said about Nash’s previous two MVP’s it was refreshing to hear Tracy McGrady on the DP Show giving props to Nash (Thursday, 22 February show). He sounded very sincere and — as Dan pointed out — was practically gushing. T-Mac also gave props to Shaq, saying he wouldn’t try to dunk on him because the big man is just, well, so big. Sports are such an incubator for ego. Perhaps that’s a reflection of the lack of civility of our modern culture. Why is it so hard for some people to give others their due? Kobe had nothing nice to say about Gilbert Arenas after The Hibachi went and dropped 60 on the Lakers last December. Very petty.

I always thought Pedro Martinez was kind of goofy, and even more so when he called the Yankees “my daddy” after he struggled against them in 2004. But he was just giving credit where credit was due. You don’t elevate yourself by cutting other people down.

If a black guy can play quarterback and if a black guy can be head coach or manager, then why can’t a white guy be MVP?

I guess it’s the same reason why chubby non-white girls are no good for a sorority.

——————————————————————————-

Sorority Evictions Raise Issue of Looks and Bias
February 25, 2007
By Sam Dillon

GREENCASTLE, Ind. — When a psychology professor at DePauw University here surveyed students, they described one sorority as a group of “daddy’s little princesses” and another as “offbeat hippies.” The sisters of Delta Zeta were seen as “socially awkward.”

Worried that a negative stereotype of the sorority was contributing to a decline in membership that had left its Greek-columned house here half empty, Delta Zeta’s national officers interviewed 35 DePauw members in November, quizzing them about their dedication to recruitment. They judged 23 of the women insufficiently committed and later told them to vacate the sorority house.

The 23 members included every woman who was overweight. They also included the only black, Korean and Vietnamese members. The dozen students allowed to stay were slender and popular with fraternity men — conventionally pretty women the sorority hoped could attract new recruits. Six of the 12 were so infuriated they quit.

“Virtually everyone who didn’t fit a certain sorority member archetype was told to leave,” said Kate Holloway, a senior who withdrew from the chapter during its reorganization.

“I sensed the disrespect with which this was to be carried out and got fed up,” Ms. Holloway added. “I didn’t have room in my life for these women to come in and tell my sisters of three years that they weren’t needed.”

Ms. Holloway is not the only angry one. The reorganization has left a messy aftermath of recrimination and tears on this rural campus of 2,400 students, 50 miles southwest of Indianapolis.

The mass eviction battered the self-esteem of many of the former sorority members, and some withdrew from classes in depression. There have been student protests, outraged letters from alumni and parents, and a faculty petition calling the sorority’s action unethical.

DePauw’s president, Robert G. Bottoms, issued a two-page letter of reprimand to the sorority. In an interview in his office, Dr. Bottoms said he had been stunned by the sorority’s insensitivity.

“I had no hint they were going to disrupt the chapter with a membership reduction of this proportion in the middle of the year,” he said. “It’s been very upsetting.”

The president of Delta Zeta, which has its headquarters in Oxford, Ohio, and its other national officers declined to be interviewed. Responding by e-mail to questions, Cynthia Winslow Menges, the executive director, said the sorority had not evicted the 23 women, even though the national officers sent those women form letters that said: “The membership review team has recommended you for alumna status. Chapter members receiving alumnae status should plan to relocate from the chapter house no later than Jan. 29, 2007.”

Ms. Menges asserted that the women themselves had, in effect, made their own decisions to leave by demonstrating a lack of commitment to meet recruitment goals. The sorority paid each woman who left $300 to cover the difference between sorority and campus housing.

The sorority “is saddened that the isolated incident at DePauw has been mischaracterized,” Ms. Menges wrote. Asked for clarification, the sorority’s public relations representative e-mailed a statement saying its actions were aimed at the “enrichment of student life at DePauw.”

This is not the first time that the DePauw chapter of Delta Zeta has stirred controversy. In 1982, it attracted national attention when a black student was not allowed to join, provoking accusations of racial discrimination.

Earlier this month, an Alabama lawyer and several other DePauw alumni who graduated in 1970 described in a letter to The DePauw, the student newspaper, how Delta Zeta’s national leadership had tried unsuccessfully to block a young woman with a black father and a white mother from joining its DePauw chapter in 1967.

Despite those incidents, the chapter appears to have been home to a diverse community over the years, partly because it has attracted brainy women, including many science and math majors, as well as talented disabled women, without focusing as exclusively as some sororities on potential recruits’ sex appeal, former sorority members said.

“I had a sister I could go to a bar with if I had boy problems,” said Erin Swisshelm, a junior biochemistry major who withdrew from the sorority in October. “I had a sister I could talk about religion with. I had a sister I could be nerdy about science with. That’s why I liked Delta Zeta, because I had all these amazing women around me.”

But over the years DePauw students had attached a negative stereotype to the chapter, as evidenced by the survey that Pam Propsom, a psychology professor, conducts each year in her class. That image had hurt recruitment, and the national officers had repeatedly warned the chapter that unless its membership increased, the chapter could close.

At the start of the fall term the national office was especially determined to raise recruitment because 2009 is the 100th anniversary of the DePauw chapter’s founding. In September, Ms. Menges and Kathi Heatherly, a national vice president of the sorority, visited the chapter to announce a reorganization plan they said would include an interview with each woman about her commitment. The women were urged to look their best for the interviews.

The tone left four women so unsettled that they withdrew from the chapter almost immediately.

Robin Lamkin, a junior who is an editor at The DePauw and was one of the 23 women evicted, said many of her sisters bought new outfits and modeled them for each other before the interviews. Many women declared their willingness to recruit diligently, Ms. Lamkin said.

A few days after the interviews, national representatives took over the house to hold a recruiting event. They asked most members to stay upstairs in their rooms. To welcome freshmen downstairs, they assembled a team that included several of the women eventually asked to stay in the sorority, along with some slender women invited from the sorority’s chapter at Indiana University, Ms. Holloway said.

“They had these unassuming freshman girls downstairs with these plastic women from Indiana University, and 25 of my sisters hiding upstairs,” she said. “It was so fake, so completely dehumanized. I said, ‘This calls for a little joke.’ ”

Ms. Holloway put on a wig and some John Lennon rose-colored glasses, burst through the front door and skipped around singing, “Ooooh! Delta Zeta!” and other chants.

The face of one of the national representatives, she recalled, “was like I’d run over her puppy with my car.”

The national representatives announced their decisions in the form letters, delivered on Dec. 2, which said that Delta Zeta intended to increase membership to 95 by the 2009 anniversary, and that it would recruit using a “core group of women.”

Elizabeth Haneline, a senior computer science major who was among those evicted, returned to the house that afternoon and found some women in tears. Even the chapter’s president had been kicked out, Ms. Haneline said, while “other women who had done almost nothing for the chapter were asked to stay.”

Six of the 12 women who were asked to stay left the sorority, including Joanna Kieschnick, a sophomore majoring in English literature. “They said, ‘You’re not good enough’ to so many people who have put their heart and soul into this chapter that I can’t stay,” she said.

In the months since, Cynthia Babington, DePauw’s dean of students, has fielded angry calls from parents, she said. Robert Hershberger, chairman of the modern languages department, circulated the faculty petition; 55 professors signed it.

“We were especially troubled that the women they expelled were less about image and more about academic achievement and social service,” Dr. Hershberger said.

During rush activities this month, 11 first-year students accepted invitations to join Delta Zeta, but only three have sought membership.

On Feb. 2, Rachel Pappas, a junior who is the chapter’s former secretary, printed 200 posters calling on students to gather that afternoon at the student union. About 50 students showed up and heard Ms. Pappas say the sorority’s national leaders had misrepresented the truth when they asserted they had evicted women for lack of commitment.

“The injustice of the lies,” she said, “is contemptible.”

 
O’Neal calls Nash’s MVPs ‘tainted’
Paul Coro
The Arizona Republic
Feb. 24, 2007 12:00 AM

MINNESOTA – Often, Steve Nash is sainted for his two MVP seasons, but Shaquille O’Neal considers them to be “tainted.”

After Miami’s loss in Dallas on Thursday, O’Neal was engaged in an MVP discussion as it related to the Mavericks’ Dirk Nowitzki. O’Neal questioned how the media picks MVPs and said the award has been “tainted” the past two seasons. O’Neal was the runner-up for Nash’s first MVP in 2005.

O’Neal repeated “tainted” references to reporters.

“I don’t know what to say,” Nash said. “I’m sorry he feels that way.”

23 February 2007, Friday

I hate you! Now take your clothes off and assume the position.

Filed under: Hot Patootie - Bless My Soul! — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 11:23:37

rrgirl writes in Everything I Learned About Men I Learned from Sports Radio:

I think we know that homophobia is more sinister and complex than a matter of tolerance. what’s being projected in that fear and loathing? I don’t want to wander too far into a topic where I’m completly unqualified, but from my understanding of men and their self-definitions, they may be more fearful of their own behavior, than that of their gay team mates. take the lid off pandora’s box, and who knows who might come prancing out in the gold hot pants. maybe tolerance has to start from the inside, before we can express it outward.

I recently read something about the sort of “fear and loathing” you mention. I haven’t been able to relocate the article on the Web, but I found this on Mind Hacks, which illustrates the same point: Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?

From the original Journal of Abnormal Psychology article:

Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

The complete article is available as a .pdf file from Oogachaga (which is one of the best site names I have ever come across — it beats “Keith .. Olbermann .. is .. Evil” by a mile!)

A latent sexuality that they fear will blossom — much as Brad’s did in The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

It’s beyond me
Help me Mommy
I’ll be good you’ll see
Take this dream away
What’s this, let’s see
I feel sexy
What’s come over me
Here it comes again.

Rocky looks good in shiny gold hot pants.

22 February 2007, Thursday

First in War, First in Peace, First in the Hearts of his Countrymen

Filed under: Lux Sit — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 22:37:18

george-washington-uw.jpg
George Washington
22 February 22 1732 – 14 December 1799

I thought I’d commemorate his birthday by posting one of his speeches, but the ones I read were quite long and written in a very difficult (for me, at least) style. There were some real neat turns of phrases and use of language, but it was hard going. I looked for a quote from Washington, and while many were good none leapt out as being quintessential.

Not that I don’t like Washington, but I’ve always like Lincoln more. (Although I’ve been to Mount Vernon twice and have yet to visit Monticello.) I don’t know much about our first president beyond the usual stuff learned in school: the cherry tree, the wooden teeth (both of these are, I discovered, just stories and not true), fighting the British, and the presidency. After browsing through a number of Web sites I feel pretty darn stupid regarding Washington. And I even graduated from the University of Washington, although learning about Ye Olde Namesake wasn’t part of the graduation requirements.

So I was stuck with nothing to say about the old boy on his day.

Then came the proverbial bolt out of the blue. The evening news delivered yet another report on the disgraceful treatment of wounded veterans housed near the Walter Reed Medical Center. It got me thinking about the poor planning for the Iraq War and the conflict in Afghanistan: how soldiers went to war without body armor, the lack of armored vehicles, and the inadequate training of some troops — because equipment is either in a war zone or awaiting repair. For some reason this recalled for me Valley Forge:

… Soldiers received irregular supplies of meat and bread, some getting their only nourishment from “firecake,”" a tasteless mixture of flour and water. …

… Clothing, too, was wholly inadequate. Long marches had destroyed shoes. Blankets were scarce. Tattered garments were seldom replaced. At one point these shortages caused nearly 4,000 men to be listed as unfit for duty. …

… Undernourished and poorly clothed, living in crowded, damp quarters, the army was ravaged by sickness and disease. Typhus, typhoid, dysentery, and pneumonia were among the killers that felled as many as 2,000 men that winter. Although Washington repeatedly petitioned for relief, the Congress was unable to provide it, and the soldiers continued to suffer. Women, relatives of enlisted men, alleviated some of the suffering by providing valuable services such as laundry and nursing that the army desperately needed. …

    From Valley Forge National Historical Park, National Park Service

Our troops thus suffered from privation even before America was a nation.

This doesn’t sound like much of a tribute to Washington, although I mean it to be. He was at Valley Forge with his men and survived to lead further campaigns in the war, win it, and eventually become president.

There is something to be said for former military personnel in public office. Senator John McCain had a certain “moderate Republican” luster in the 2000 campaign, but has been very hawkish since 9/11. I realize that his take on the war is strongly infuenced by his time spent in the military. The same goes for Senator Chuck Hagel, Representative John Murtha, Senator John Kerry, and others who have served. They bring a different perspective to the national debate, one that civilians like me cannot fully appreciate. It’s difficult to say if we’d be better off in wartime having a president with actual battlefield experience. Since the military became an all-volunteer service a lower proportion of Americans have seen duty, as opposed to my parents’ (the World War II) generation.

At any rate, Happy Birthday George Washington. It’s too bad the country only remembers you for being on the dollar bill and late winter sales on bed linen and household appliances.

21 February 2007, Wednesday

Lent: A 40-day Run-up to the Start of Baseball Season

Filed under: Moral Force, Wheel of Life — Keith Olbermann Is Evil @ 23:59:30

I feel kind of weird writing about Lent, as I am on record with this:

The way I see it: if God exists that’s fine, but if He doesn’t, I’m cool with that, too.

But I’ve always liked Lent and just because I’m not Christian is — I feel — just a minor technicality.

Why do I like Lent?

Well, it’s the countdown to Easter, which is always a nice time for our family. Not in a religious way, but in the secular Jelly Beans and Chocolate Bunnies sort of way. Dyeing eggs (when we were kids my father was really great at poking holes in the ends of raw eggs and blowing out the insides so that we would have the whole empty eggshells to decorate; I usually just blow raw egg schmutz halfway across the kitchen), the smell of vinegar (I think it helps the dye stick to the eggs), that weird plastic Easter grass you put in the basket, those plastic Easter eggs (the halves of which always get separated and lost or broken so that you never ever can put together a mono-colored egg), how to eat the chocolate bunnies (do you go for the head first, or do you save it for last?) ….

The Easter season evokes a lot of great childhood memories. But as I got older I realized why Easter was important in a religious way. Eventually it came to me that even though Christmas is a much more celebrated occasion, Easter is much more significant as it commemorates the resurrection of Christ.

A while back I worked with a number of people who observed Lent by performing the traditional act of penance by renouncing what they considered to be a bad habit. One fellow gave up coffee; he felt he was drinking too much. Another gave up cheeseburgers, which I thought was rather trivial as far as the holiness of the season goes. But what the heck. Who am I — the non-Christian — to criticize? In chatting with another fellow, he told me in the past his children had tried things like giving up candy, which never lasted long. But that year instead of getting the kids to appreciate Lent by refraining from doing something “bad,” he and his wife were going to encourage them to do something good for each of the 40 days. I thought that was a swell idea, and a much more positive way to demonstrate one’s religious faith.

Since then every year for Lent I choose a theme and try do something that I normally do not do on a daily basis. It’s a nice, defined period which many people observe; I try to use it in a way to help myself become a better person. Sometimes it gets mundane: doing chores around the house that had been neglected. But other times I actually do something that borders on the spiritual: broadening my scope of reading, putting together packages to send to friends stationed overseas, volunteering at a local charity. My favorite Lenten activity was writing a letter or postcard to a friend or relative every day. If life got particularly hectic I’d take a Sunday off, but for the most part I wrote a letter every single day during the period between Ash Wednesday and Easter Sunday. Email did not count; it had to be a real card or letter. This turned out to be a great exercise, as I’d fallen out-of-touch with a lot of people and many of my aunts and uncles are pretty old and set in their ways and don’t use email. It was a terrific way to re-connect with a lot of people.

So here it is, the end of Ash Wednesday and I still haven’t picked a theme for Lent 2007. I’ve always wanted to read the Bible and maybe I will try to delve into it. American Catholic has a Daily Meditation which I usually read during Lent. A good exercise would be to not only read it every day but also read the passage from scripture that is associated with each meditation.

OK, here goes.

Lent 2007: Gentlemen (and gentlewomen), start your engines!

Today’s meditation:

Start (or continue) a spiritual journal today. Set down spiritual goals that you hope will accompany your concrete penances to return to the Lord.
Joel 2:12-18

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.